The Shelley–Gray Dispute : The Changing Culture of Carp Fishing.

Shop Now

Tensions On The Bank.

In a sport built on patience, stillness, and respect for nature, few things stir more heat than a debate over fish care. But when two of carp fishing’s most recognisable figures—Jim Shelley and Elliot Gray—clash publicly, the ripples spread far beyond the lakebed.

What began as a disagreement over the sacking of a carp has turned into something much bigger: a flashpoint in an ongoing discussion about ethics, experience, and the soul of modern carp fishing. The recent dispute has not only raised questions about angling practice but exposed a growing divide in the culture of carp fishing itself.

The Incident: Allegations and Denials

In 2025, Jim Shelley publicly claimed that a carp had died after being sacked by another angler—allegedly due to poor handling or judgement. Without naming names directly, Shelley strongly implied that Elliot Gray was responsible. The comments quickly gained traction online, where followers of both men began speculating.

Elliot Gray responded soon after, firmly denying the accusation. He stated that the fish in question was released safely and that the claims were “completely false.” Gray, known for his precise and polished approach to angling, defended his knowledge and experience, stating he has always practiced responsible fish care.

In a video posted on his platform, Gray went further: ‘I’ve been sacking fish responsibly for years. I know how to do it properly’.

Shelley, equally firm in his position, stood by his belief that the fish had suffered due to poor sacking practice.

The Sacking Debate: Tradition Meets Scrutiny

The dispute has reignited one of carp fishing’s most sensitive debates: the ethics and safety of sacking carp.

Traditionally, sacking has been a widely accepted practice—used by anglers to temporarily retain a fish, often to allow for better daylight photos or recovery time. When done correctly, in cool, well-oxygenated water with secure, purpose-made sacks, many still see it as safe.

But times are changing. A growing number of anglers, particularly among the younger or more conservation-focused generation, now question the practice. Critics argue that sacking places unnecessary stress on fish and can lead to injury or even death if mishandled.

Supporters of sacking, including many experienced anglers, maintain that when used properly—and for brief periods—it remains a valid tool. Jim Shelley, in particular, has publicly defended the practice in the past, calling it ‘part of proper carp care’ when used with respect and skill.

Is it right to say that this cultural tension—between long-standing tradition and modern scrutiny—sits at the heart of the Shelley–Gray exchange. Or Is it fairer to say that a personal dispute has caused this debate ?

A Fractured Scene?

Beyond the issue of sacking lies a deeper concern: how disagreements are now playing out in the angling community.

Carp fishing has always had its characters and rivalries, but many feel the tone has shifted in recent years. What were once private disagreements are now broadcast publicly—sometimes in real-time—and often take place through social media platforms where nuance is quickly lost, and tribalism takes hold.

It’s not just Shelley and Gray. Across the angling world, public callouts, backhanded jabs, and online “pile-ons” have become increasingly common. There is a growing sense that carp fishing—a pursuit that once prided itself on camaraderie and quiet respect—is becoming a world of suspicion, criticism, and backstabbing.

One respected southern angler, who asked not to be named, put it this way: “We used to share tea and talk tactics. Now people share WhatsApp messages and talk behind each other’s backs. It’s all got a bit nasty.”

Syndicates, Status and Silos

Much of this shift has been magnified within the closed worlds of syndicate fishing. Once havens of quiet devotion and shared admiration for the waters they protect, syndicates today can—at times—become echo chambers for ego, gossip, and, in the worst cases, subtle bullying.

Anglers report feeling excluded, side-eyed, or spoken about for catching the “wrong” fish, talking to the “wrong” people, or simply doing things a different way. What should be a shared love of the craft can morph into a hierarchy of status, jealousy, and immaturity—sometimes played out like a schoolyard rather than the serene settings that surround it.

It’s a contradiction that hasn’t gone unnoticed. In the most tranquil of natural settings, childish behaviour can still take root—fuelled by social media, competition for reputation, and the increasingly blurred line between angling and performance.

These undercurrents don’t define all syndicates, of course. Many are still run on principles of mutual respect and passion for carp. But the cultural climate can be sharp, especially for younger anglers or those who don’t conform to the dominant social group. For a scene that values silence and solitude, the noise—real or implied—can be deafening.

Personalities and Public Platforms

There’s no denying that Elliot Gray and Jim Shelley represent very different faces of modern carp fishing.

Shelley, with his raw, unfiltered persona and near-mythic track record. Gray is more polished and media-savvy and represents a more modern style of angling—visually sharp, technically refined, and deeply connected to branding and presentation.

Both have their supporters. Both have contributed hugely to carp fishing’s popularity and evolution. But their recent conflict illustrates what happens when those two worlds collide—not just privately, but in the public eye, where every statement becomes part of a wider narrative.

Moving Forward: Can Respect Return?

It’s worth asking: what does this dispute really teach us?

At one level, it’s a simple disagreement over fish care. At another, it’s a symbol of something much larger—a cultural shift in how carp anglers relate to one another, and how differences are resolved.

We don’t need to decide who was right to recognise what’s wrong with how this unfolded. Accusations aired publicly, reputations questioned, communities divided. It’s not good for the anglers involved, nor for the sport as a whole.

Healthy debate is necessary. Calling out genuinely harmful practices—when done respectfully and with evidence—has a place. But when personal disputes become public sagas, and when anglers start fearing the judgement of their peers more than the welfare of the fish, something has gone off track.

At British Carp Culture, we believe this is a moment for reflection. Not just on how we care for fish, but how we care for each other. The banks will always be home to opinion, disagreement, and debate—but let’s not let them become battlefields.

Because carp fishing, at its heart, is still about respect: for the fish, for the water, and for those who share it.

Tight Lines